 |
Featured Articles
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Articles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
News Articles Archive
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
| Army Desertion Rate Highest Since 1980 |
329 Views |
| posted on Saturday, November 17, 2007 |
|
|
ARMY DESERTION RATE HIGHEST SINCE 1980
By Lolita C. Baldor
Associated Press
November 16, 2007
Original Link
WASHINGTON - Soldiers strained by six years at war are deserting their posts at the highest rate since 1980, with the number of Army deserters this year showing an 80 percent increase since the United States invaded Iraq in 2003.
While the totals are still far lower than they were during the Vietnam War, when the draft was in effect, they show a steady increase over the past four years and a 42 percent jump since last year.
"We're asking a lot of soldiers these days," said Roy Wallace, director of plans and resources for Army personnel. "They're humans. They have all sorts of issues back home and other places like that. So, I'm sure it has to do with the stress of being a soldier."
The Army defines a deserter as someone who has been absent without leave for longer than 30 days. The soldier is then discharged as a deserter.
According to the Army, about nine in every 1,000 soldiers deserted in fiscal year 2007, which ended Sept. 30, compared to nearly seven per 1,000 a year earlier. Overall, 4,698 soldiers deserted this year, compared to 3,301 last year.
The increase comes as the Army continues to bear the brunt of the war demands with many soldiers serving repeated, lengthy tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. Military leaders -- including Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey - have acknowledged that the Army has been stretched nearly to the breaking point by the combat. Efforts are under way to increase the size of the Army and Marine Corps to lessen the burden and give troops more time off between deployments.
"We have been concentrating on this," said Wallace. "The Army can't afford to throw away good people. We have got to work with those individuals and try to help them become good soldiers."
Still, he noted that "the military is not for everybody, not everybody can be a soldier." And those who want to leave the service will find a way to do it, he said.
While the Army does not have an up-to-date profile of deserters, more than 75 percent of them are soldiers in their first term of enlistment. And most are male.
Soldiers can sign on initially for two to six years. Wallace said he did not know whether deserters were more likely to be those who enlisted for a short or long tour.
At the same time, he said that even as desertions have increased, the Army has seen some overall success in keeping first-term soldiers in the service.
There are four main ways that soldiers can leave the Army before their first enlistment contract is up:
- They are determined unable to meet physical fitness requirements.
- They are found to be unable to adapt to the military.
- They say they are gay and are required to leave under the so-called "don't ask, don't tell" policy.
- They go AWOL.
According to Wallace, in the summer of 2005, more than 18 percent of the soldiers in their first six months of service left under one of those four provisions. In June 2007, that number had dropped to about 7 percent.
The decline, he said, is largely due to a drop in the number of soldiers who leave due to physical fitness or health reasons.
Army desertion rates have fluctuated since the Vietnam War -- when they peaked at 5 percent. In the 1970s they hovered between 1 and 3 percent, which is up to three out of every 100 soldiers. Those rates plunged in the 1980s and early 1990s to between 2 and 3 out of every 1,000 soldiers.
Desertions began to creep up in the late 1990s into the turn of the century, when the U.S. conducted an air war in Kosovo and later sent peacekeeping troops there.
The numbers declined in 2003 and 2004, in the early years of the Iraq war, but then began to increase steadily.
In contrast, the Navy has seen a steady decline in deserters since 2001, going from 3,665 that year to 1,129 in 2007.
The Marine Corps, meanwhile, has seen the number of deserters stay fairly stable over that timeframe -- with about 1,000 deserters a year. During 2003 and 2004 -- the first two years of the Iraq war -- the number of deserters fell to 877 and 744, respectively.
The Air Force can tout the fewest number of deserters -- with no more than 56 bolting in each of the past five years. The low was in fiscal 2007, with just 16 deserters.
Despite the continued increase in Army desertions, however, an Associated Press examination of Pentagon figures earlier this year showed that the military does little to find those who bolt, and rarely prosecutes the ones they find. Some are allowed to simply return to their units, while most are given less-than-honorable discharges.
"My personal opinion is the only way to stop desertions is to change the climate ... how they are living and doing what they need to do," said Wallace, adding that good officers and more attention from Army leaders could "go a long way to stemming desertions."
Unlike those in the Vietnam era, deserters from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars may not find Canada a safe haven.
Just this week, the Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear the appeals of two Army deserters who sought refugee status to avoid the war in Iraq. The ruling left them without a legal basis to stay in Canada and dealt a blow to other Americans in similar circumstances.
The court, as is usual, did not provide a reason for the decision.
------------
PREVIOUS NHNE NEWS LIST ARTICLES:
ARMY HAS RECORD LOW LEVEL OF RECRUITS (11/1/2007):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/13706
U.S. ARMY LOWERS ITS RECRUITING STANDARDS (10/13/2007):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/13608
TOP MILITARY RECRUITMENT LIES (& THE COUNTERRECRUITMENT MOVEMENT)
(9/23/2007):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/13516
WHEN A U.S. SOLDIER IN IRAQ REFUSES TO KILL (8/20/2007):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/13338
FED UP WITH WAR, SOME WON'T PAY TAXES (7/4/2007):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/13189
WEBSITE FOR CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTORS (& RELATED TOPICS) (1/18/2007):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/12449
VIETNAM & IRAQ WAR RESISTORS GATHER IN CANADA (1/18/2007):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/12449
FOLLOWUP: VIETNAM DOCUMENTARY: 'SIR! NO SIR!' (1/14/2007):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/12427
HISTORY REPEATING ITSELF? VIETNAM DOCUMENTARY: 'SIR! NO SIR!' (1/14/2007):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/12426
IRAQ VETS LEFT IN PHYSICAL & MENTAL AGONY (1/5/2007):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/12377
ACTIVE DUTY SOLDIERS CALL FOR END TO IRAQI OCCUPATION (12/18/2006):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/12292
U.S. ARMY IN SERIOUS TROUBLE (12/14/2006):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/12264
POISONING U.S. TROOPS: ANTHRAX, LIES AND VACCINES (10/18/2006):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/12009
THE PENTAGON'S 12- STEP PROGRAM TO CREATE A MILITARY OF MISFITS (9/15/2006):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/11848
NEO-NAZIS INFILTRATING US MILITARY (7/9/2006):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/11488
PERSPECTIVE: THE ANTI-WAR ESSAYS OF CAMILO MEJI (3/22/2006):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/11029
ARMY REACHING BREAKING POINT (1/26/2006):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/10739
U.S. ARMY RAISES MAXIMUM AGE FOR ENLISTMENT (1/22/2006):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/10710
ANY SOLDIER WILL DO (11/13/2005):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/10335
PERSPECTIVE: TRUTH IN RECRUITING (8/22/2005):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/9786
WAR VETERANS PASS ON TRAUMA TO FUTURE GENERATIONS (8/16/2005):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/9750
PERSPECTIVE: IRAQ WAR: TALKING WOUNDED (8/10/2005):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/9711
PERSPECTIVE: IRAQ WAR: 'WHAT HAVE WE DONE?' (8/10/2005):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/9710
HELL NO, THEY WON'T GO (6/13/2005):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/9338
ANTI-WAR STUDENTS SANCTIONED AT SFSU (6/10/2005):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/9308
PARENTS BECOME GROWING PROBLEM FOR MILITARY RECRUITERS (6/3/2005):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/9279
PROTECTING TEENAGERS FROM AGGRESSIVE MILITARY RECRUITMENT (6/2/2005):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/9271
CAMILO MEJIA ON DISSENT IN U.S. MILITARY (5/25/2005):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/9235
NAVY JUDGE FINDS WAR PROTEST REASONABLE (5/14/2005):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/9176
CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR LAUNCHES WEB SITE (2/8/2005):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/8827
IRAQ VETERANS TURN WAR CRITICS (1/27/2005):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/8760
PEACE ACTIVISTS COUNTER RECRUITING BY MILITARY IN SCHOOLS (6/29/2004):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/7483
60 MINUTES: DESERTERS: WE WON'T GO TO IRAQ (12/14/2004):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/8543
YESTERDAY'S DRAFT DODGERS HELP TODAY'S WAR RESISTERS (12/8/2004):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/8476
STAFF SGT. CAMILO MEJIA FOUND GUILTY (5/21/2004):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/7239
PERSPECTIVE: THE COURT-MARTIAL OF STAFF SGT. CAMILO MEJIA (5/21/2004):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/7236
HUNDREDS OF U.S. SOLDIERS EMERGE AS CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTORS (4/18/2003):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/5144
THE FIRST AMERICAN CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTOR FROM IRAQ WAR (4/12/2003):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/5096
CANADA & MEXICO: STANDING UP TO UNCLE SAM (3/28/2003):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/message/4940
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
............
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Unless the information in question has been written and/or published by NHNE, NHNE has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article. NHNE is, therefore, not endorsed or sponsored by the originator, nor does NHNE necessarily endorse, promote, or agree with the content. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|
|
|
|